-
Type:
Bug
-
Resolution: Won't Fix
-
Priority:
P2
-
None
-
Affects Version/s: 6
-
Component/s: tools
-
x86
-
windows_xp
FULL PRODUCT VERSION :
java version "1.6.0_01"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_01-b06)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.6.0_01-b06, mixed mode, sharing)
ADDITIONAL OS VERSION INFORMATION :
Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
A DESCRIPTION OF THE PROBLEM :
target cldc1.0 is not a valid target option:
javac -target cldc1.0 ...
STEPS TO FOLLOW TO REPRODUCE THE PROBLEM :
In cmd prompt, write:
javac -target cldc1.0 A.java
EXPECTED VERSUS ACTUAL BEHAVIOR :
EXPECTED -
Compilation should work as in jdk5
ACTUAL -
This information is written as output from javac:
javac: invalid target release: cldc1.0
ERROR MESSAGES/STACK TRACES THAT OCCUR :
javac: invalid target release: cldc1.0
REPRODUCIBILITY :
This bug can be reproduced always.
---------- BEGIN SOURCE ----------
A.java
=====
public class A {}
---------- END SOURCE ----------
Release Regression From : 5.0u11
The above release value was the last known release where this
bug was not reproducible. Since then there has been a regression.
java version "1.6.0_01"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_01-b06)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.6.0_01-b06, mixed mode, sharing)
ADDITIONAL OS VERSION INFORMATION :
Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
A DESCRIPTION OF THE PROBLEM :
target cldc1.0 is not a valid target option:
javac -target cldc1.0 ...
STEPS TO FOLLOW TO REPRODUCE THE PROBLEM :
In cmd prompt, write:
javac -target cldc1.0 A.java
EXPECTED VERSUS ACTUAL BEHAVIOR :
EXPECTED -
Compilation should work as in jdk5
ACTUAL -
This information is written as output from javac:
javac: invalid target release: cldc1.0
ERROR MESSAGES/STACK TRACES THAT OCCUR :
javac: invalid target release: cldc1.0
REPRODUCIBILITY :
This bug can be reproduced always.
---------- BEGIN SOURCE ----------
A.java
=====
public class A {}
---------- END SOURCE ----------
Release Regression From : 5.0u11
The above release value was the last known release where this
bug was not reproducible. Since then there has been a regression.