-
Bug
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
P4
-
9
-
b19
| Issue | Fix Version | Assignee | Priority | Status | Resolution | Resolved In Build |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JDK-8208893 | 8u201 | Lois Foltan | P4 | Resolved | Fixed | b01 |
| JDK-8202375 | 8u192 | Lois Foltan | P4 | Resolved | Fixed | b01 |
| JDK-8216713 | emb-8u201 | Lois Foltan | P4 | Resolved | Fixed | master |
Issue with CHECK_UNHANDLED_OOPS copy constructor definitions:
"<directory>/src/share/vm/classfile/javaClasses.hpp", line 1183: Error: Initializing const volatile oop& requires an lvalue.
"<directory>/src/share/vm/classfile/javaClasses.hpp", line 1183: Error: Formal argument o of type const volatile oop& in call to oop::oop(const volatile oop&) is being passed volatile oop.
2 Error(s) detected.
"<directory>/src/share/vm/classfile/javaClasses.hpp", line 1183: Error: Initializing const volatile oop& requires an lvalue.
"<directory>/src/share/vm/classfile/javaClasses.hpp", line 1183: Error: Formal argument o of type const volatile oop& in call to oop::oop(const volatile oop&) is being passed volatile oop.
2 Error(s) detected.
- backported by
-
JDK-8202375 Solaris Studio 12.4 C++ 5.13, CHECK_UNHANDLED_OOPS use of class oop's copy constructor definitions causing error level diagnostic
-
- Resolved
-
-
-
- Resolved
-
-
-
- Resolved
-
- relates to
-
-
- Closed
-