Uploaded image for project: 'JDK'
  1. JDK
  2. JDK-8253322

Update the specification in the newly added constructors

XMLWordPrintable

    • Icon: Bug Bug
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Icon: P4 P4
    • 16
    • 16
    • client-libs
    • b18
    • generic
    • generic

      Looks like different people use a different style for the new constructors, it will be good to unify them.

          * The text "Constructor for subclasses to call." should be used in the protected constructors in the abstract classes
          * In all other cases the text "Constructs an {@code ClassName}." should be used
          * A period (full stop) to the end of all javadoc comments, should be added if it is missing

      I have started from https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8252721
      See
      https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8252908?focusedCommentId=14370006&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#comment-14370006

      But since I already touched a bunch of classes, I decided to update some other fixes as well.

      This will update the changes for:
      https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8252721
      https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8252195
      https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8250858

            serb Sergey Bylokhov
            serb Sergey Bylokhov
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            3 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: