Uploaded image for project: 'JDK'
  1. JDK
  2. JDK-8253322

Update the specification in the newly added constructors

    XMLWordPrintable

Details

    • Bug
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • P4
    • 16
    • 16
    • client-libs
    • b18
    • generic
    • generic

    Description

      Looks like different people use a different style for the new constructors, it will be good to unify them.

          * The text "Constructor for subclasses to call." should be used in the protected constructors in the abstract classes
          * In all other cases the text "Constructs an {@code ClassName}." should be used
          * A period (full stop) to the end of all javadoc comments, should be added if it is missing

      I have started from https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8252721
      See
      https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8252908?focusedCommentId=14370006&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#comment-14370006

      But since I already touched a bunch of classes, I decided to update some other fixes as well.

      This will update the changes for:
      https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8252721
      https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8252195
      https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8250858

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          Activity

            People

              serb Sergey Bylokhov
              serb Sergey Bylokhov
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              3 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: