P4 Description
FULL PRODUCT VERSION :
java version " 1.8.0-ea "
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0-ea-b93)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.0-b34, mixed mode)
ADDITIONAL OS VERSION INFORMATION :
Windows 7 64-bit
A DESCRIPTION OF THE PROBLEM :
Currently, MessageFormat /only/ supports SimpleDateFormat and instances of java.util.Date or java.util.Calendar for date/time values. Because of this, it's impossible to use Java 8 date/time types with any of the i18n and localization tools.
MessageFormat really needs support for types in java.time. I'm not even sure how it should work. I'm not sure how MessageFormat can know whether a SimpleDateFormat string or a DateTimeFormatter string is being supplied. Possibly, validation of the format string must be delayed until either a Date/Calendar or a java.time type is supplied for formatting.
REPRODUCIBILITY :
This bug can be reproduced always.
java version " 1.8.0-ea "
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0-ea-b93)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.0-b34, mixed mode)
ADDITIONAL OS VERSION INFORMATION :
Windows 7 64-bit
A DESCRIPTION OF THE PROBLEM :
Currently, MessageFormat /only/ supports SimpleDateFormat and instances of java.util.Date or java.util.Calendar for date/time values. Because of this, it's impossible to use Java 8 date/time types with any of the i18n and localization tools.
MessageFormat really needs support for types in java.time. I'm not even sure how it should work. I'm not sure how MessageFormat can know whether a SimpleDateFormat string or a DateTimeFormatter string is being supplied. Possibly, validation of the format string must be delayed until either a Date/Calendar or a java.time type is supplied for formatting.
REPRODUCIBILITY :
This bug can be reproduced always.