| Issue | Fix Version | Assignee | Priority | Status | Resolution | Resolved In Build |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JDK-8048403 | 8u25 | Stephen Colebourne | P3 | Resolved | Fixed | b05 |
| JDK-8044664 | 8u20 | Stephen Colebourne | P3 | Resolved | Fixed | b20 |
| JDK-8053662 | emb-8u26 | Stephen Colebourne | P3 | Resolved | Fixed | b17 |
The implementation of IsoFields.WEEK_BASED_YEAR is completely invalid. As a result, addition using WEEK_BASED_YEARS is broken.
Given an input date 2012-W30-6 setting the week-based-year should only change the year and leave the week and day-of-week unaltered (except where week 53 becomes week 52). The current implementation does not achieve this.
In addition, the current code does not reset back to the input temporal, which results inJDK-8038490.
Sadly, this code managed to make it into the JDK with no tests, which also needs addressing.
Given an input date 2012-W30-6 setting the week-based-year should only change the year and leave the week and day-of-week unaltered (except where week 53 becomes week 52). The current implementation does not achieve this.
In addition, the current code does not reset back to the input temporal, which results in
Sadly, this code managed to make it into the JDK with no tests, which also needs addressing.
- backported by
-
JDK-8044664 IsoFields.WEEK_BASED_YEAR adjustInto incorrect
-
- Resolved
-
-
-
- Resolved
-
-
-
- Resolved
-
- duplicates
-
JDK-8038490 Using IsoFields.WEEK_BASED_YEAR with ZonedDateTime throws ClassCastException
-
- Closed
-