- 
    Type:
Enhancement
 - 
    Resolution: Duplicate
 - 
    Priority:
  P4                     
     - 
    None
 - 
    Affects Version/s: 8
 - 
    Component/s: core-libs
 
                    As described in JDK-8227006 the addition of container support has slowed down the execution of Runtime.availableProcessors. By calling this function in its spin-loop waitingGet() can also suffer from a severe slowdown in performance.
spins = (Runtime.getRuntime().availableProcessors() > 1) ?
1 << 8 : 0; // Use brief spin-wait on multiprocessors
As we only care about >1 processors we can cache this value in a field. The only problem case would be a >1 to 1 transition which is an unlikely change. If it did occur it would only result in a small performance hit anyway.
This fix is only needed for 8u as 9 and later have different code due toJDK-8157522
            
spins = (Runtime.getRuntime().availableProcessors() > 1) ?
1 << 8 : 0; // Use brief spin-wait on multiprocessors
As we only care about >1 processors we can cache this value in a field. The only problem case would be a >1 to 1 transition which is an unlikely change. If it did occur it would only result in a small performance hit anyway.
This fix is only needed for 8u as 9 and later have different code due to
- duplicates
 - 
                    
JDK-8227018 CompletableFuture should not call Runtime.availableProcessors on fast path
-         
     - Resolved
 
 -         
 
- relates to
 - 
                    
JDK-8157522 Performance improvements to CompletableFuture
-         
     - Resolved
 
 -         
 - 
                    
JDK-8227006 [linux] Runtime.availableProcessors execution time increased by factor of 100
-         
     - Resolved
 
 -