[hamilton 11/16/95] This bug is fixed and verified, AND CLOSED to get it off
our list. But, Closed because doesn't offer any reasonable choices (Fixed verified
and Fixed unverified are grayed out), so I chose not a bug.
> To: java@java
> Subject: Typo in white paper
> Date: Wed, 14 Jun 1995 12:12:31 EDT
> From: Tim Macinta <###@###.###>
>
> I believe there is a typo in the postscript and hypertext versions of your
> white paper, "The Java Language Experiment." On page 32, the last sentence of
> the introductory paragraph of chapter 3 reads:
>
> > Finally, reliability is at a high premium in the distributed world--code
>
> > from anywhere on the network should work robustly without low
> ^^^^^^^ ^^^
> > probabilities of creating "crashes" in applications importing code
>
> > fragments.
>
> I assume that you meant to say "with low probabilities" or "without high
> probabilities."
Yup, I'd assume so.
>
> - Tim Macinta
> ###@###.###
our list. But, Closed because doesn't offer any reasonable choices (Fixed verified
and Fixed unverified are grayed out), so I chose not a bug.
> To: java@java
> Subject: Typo in white paper
> Date: Wed, 14 Jun 1995 12:12:31 EDT
> From: Tim Macinta <###@###.###>
>
> I believe there is a typo in the postscript and hypertext versions of your
> white paper, "The Java Language Experiment." On page 32, the last sentence of
> the introductory paragraph of chapter 3 reads:
>
> > Finally, reliability is at a high premium in the distributed world--code
>
> > from anywhere on the network should work robustly without low
> ^^^^^^^ ^^^
> > probabilities of creating "crashes" in applications importing code
>
> > fragments.
>
> I assume that you meant to say "with low probabilities" or "without high
> probabilities."
Yup, I'd assume so.
>
> - Tim Macinta
> ###@###.###