-
Enhancement
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
P4
-
1.2.0
-
None
-
1.2beta3
-
sparc
-
solaris_2.5.1
-
Not verified
[The original bug report cited that Runtime.traceMethodCalls() is not
implemented. It is implemented in java_g, but in 1.2 we do not
ship _g files any more. See also evaluation.]
anand.palaniswamy@Eng 1998-02-05
Original report:
Name: sg39081 Date: 08/18/97
It would be nice if the JDK from JavaSoft actually implemented the
java.lang.Runtime.traceMethodCalls(boolean)
method.
This would aid in debugging and system performance enhancements.
======================================================================
Additonal information from user, 1997-09-04
I have to apologize for submitting that the traceMethodCalls
should be implemented. We just noticed that the java_g, the non-optimized
java interpreter, does implement Runtime :: traceMethodCalls.
Please make sure that this does continue in subsequent JDK releases.
You may want to add some more obvious documentation explaining what
java_g can be used for.
implemented. It is implemented in java_g, but in 1.2 we do not
ship _g files any more. See also evaluation.]
anand.palaniswamy@Eng 1998-02-05
Original report:
Name: sg39081 Date: 08/18/97
It would be nice if the JDK from JavaSoft actually implemented the
java.lang.Runtime.traceMethodCalls(boolean)
method.
This would aid in debugging and system performance enhancements.
======================================================================
Additonal information from user, 1997-09-04
I have to apologize for submitting that the traceMethodCalls
should be implemented. We just noticed that the java_g, the non-optimized
java interpreter, does implement Runtime :: traceMethodCalls.
Please make sure that this does continue in subsequent JDK releases.
You may want to add some more obvious documentation explaining what
java_g can be used for.
- relates to
-
JDK-4109957 JDK *debug* ishield bundle not made
-
- Closed
-