Uploaded image for project: 'JDK'
  1. JDK
  2. JDK-4231433

javac Class - get rid of the .java extension?

XMLWordPrintable

    • Icon: Bug Bug
    • Resolution: Duplicate
    • Icon: P4 P4
    • None
    • 1.2.1
    • tools
    • generic
    • generic



      Name: krT82822 Date: 04/20/99


      Why must we always have to put the .java extension when doing
      javac compiles?

      Every programming language I have always worked with has always
      had its default and I have been programming in java for 2 years
      and finally had the notion to voice this.

      When executing a Java program you just put java Class - this is
      good because the default extension is .class, why not do the
      same when compiling.

      This is just more typing and not necessary to add the extension.
      (Review ID: 57239)
      ======================================================================

      Name: skT88420 Date: 05/26/99


      I HAVE REPORTED THIS BEFORE AND AM GETTING TIRED OF YOUR
      COMPANY NOT HEEDING WHAT ALL JAVA USERS WANT.

      FIX THE PROBLEM OR GIVE ME FEEDBACK.

      javac - SHOULDN'T REQUIRE .java extensions. PERIOD.

      EVERY COMPUTER LANGUAGE IN THE WORLD HAS A DEFAULT WHY DOESN'T
      JAVA.

      JAVA IS A GREAT LANGUAGE BUT I DON'T UNDERSTAND WHAT THE DESIGNERS
      WERE THINKING. ITS JUST PLAIN WRONG.

      I WANT FEEDBACK AND SO DO SEVERAL OTHERS IN MY JAVA GROUP.
      ID57239
      (Review ID: 83476)
      ======================================================================

            wmaddoxsunw William Maddox (Inactive)
            kryansunw Kevin Ryan (Inactive)
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            0 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved:
              Imported:
              Indexed: