Uploaded image for project: 'JDK'
  1. JDK
  2. JDK-4310073

AccessibleRelation doc incorrectly claims it has no public constructor

XMLWordPrintable

    • Icon: Bug Bug
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Icon: P3 P3
    • 1.4.0
    • 1.3.0
    • docs
    • beta
    • generic
    • generic



      Name: krT82822 Date: 02/04/2000


      java 1.3rc1

      The doc comment for javax.accessibility.AccessibleRelation
      looks like it was cut-and-pasted from AccessibleState.
      It is just plain wrong. Says there is no public
      constructor, for example, when there clearly is.

      ----------

      4 Feb 2000 eval1127@eng -- "A public constructor for this class has been
      purposely omitted and applications should use one of the constants from this class. "
      (Review ID: 100781)
      ======================================================================

            asommere Alan Sommerer (Inactive)
            kryansunw Kevin Ryan (Inactive)
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            0 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved:
              Imported:
              Indexed: