-
Bug
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
P2
-
1.4.0
-
beta2
-
generic
-
generic
The following program demonstrates that accessing elements of a byte buffer is
significantly slower with C1 than accessing elements of an array:
% /usr/local/java/jdk1.4/linux-i386/bin/java -client -showversion BBSpeed
java version "1.4.0-beta"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.0-beta-b50)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4beta-B50, mixed mode)
array 225
array rev 286
heap 1147
heap rev 1148
direct 3301
direct rev 3304
%
I get similar numbers on Solaris (times are in ms).
(The numbers for direct byte buffers are even worse than those for
heap-allocated byte buffers due to the fact that C1 does not yet inline
sun.misc.Unsafe operations (4411596).)
Making both heap and direct buffers perform as well as arrays (or nearly so) is
critical to the performance of the java.nio subsystem.
-- mr@eng 2001/2/4
---- BBSpeed.java
import java.nio.*;
public class BBSpeed {
static final int SIZE = 4096;
static final int TRIALS = 4096;
static int sum(ByteBuffer bb) {
int n = bb.capacity();
int a = 0;
bb.rewind();
for (int j = 0; j < n; j++)
a += bb.get(j);
return a;
}
static int sumReverse(ByteBuffer bb) {
int n = bb.capacity();
int a = 0;
bb.rewind();
for (int j = n - 1; j >= 0; j--)
a += bb.get(j);
return a;
}
static int time(String name, ByteBuffer bb) {
int n = bb.capacity();
bb.limit(bb.capacity());
int a = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < TRIALS; i++) sum(bb);
long start = System.currentTimeMillis();
for (int i = 0; i < TRIALS; i++) sum(bb);
System.out.println(name + " " + (System.currentTimeMillis() - start));
for (int i = 0; i < TRIALS; i++) sumReverse(bb);
start = System.currentTimeMillis();
for (int i = 0; i < TRIALS; i++) sumReverse(bb);
System.out.println(name + " rev " + (System.currentTimeMillis() - start));
return a;
}
static int sum(byte[] ba) {
int n = ba.length;
int a = 0;
for (int j = 0; j < n; j++)
a += ba[j];
return a;
}
static int sumReverse(byte[] ba) {
int n = ba.length;
int a = 0;
for (int j = n - 1; j >= 0; j--)
a += ba[j];
return a;
}
static int timeArray() {
byte[] ba = new byte[SIZE];
int a = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < TRIALS; i++) a += sum(ba);
long start = System.currentTimeMillis();
for (int i = 0; i < TRIALS; i++) a += sum(ba);
System.out.println("array " + (System.currentTimeMillis() - start));
for (int i = 0; i < TRIALS; i++) a += sumReverse(ba);
start = System.currentTimeMillis();
for (int i = 0; i < TRIALS; i++) a += sumReverse(ba);
System.out.println("array rev " + (System.currentTimeMillis() - start));
return a;
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
String key = "hda";
if (args.length == 1)
key = args[0];
int a = 0;
if (key.indexOf('a') >= 0)
a += timeArray();
if (key.indexOf('h') >= 0)
a += time("heap", ByteBuffer.allocate(SIZE));
if (key.indexOf('d') >= 0)
a += time("direct", ByteBuffer.allocateDirect(SIZE));
System.exit(a);
}
}
significantly slower with C1 than accessing elements of an array:
% /usr/local/java/jdk1.4/linux-i386/bin/java -client -showversion BBSpeed
java version "1.4.0-beta"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.0-beta-b50)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4beta-B50, mixed mode)
array 225
array rev 286
heap 1147
heap rev 1148
direct 3301
direct rev 3304
%
I get similar numbers on Solaris (times are in ms).
(The numbers for direct byte buffers are even worse than those for
heap-allocated byte buffers due to the fact that C1 does not yet inline
sun.misc.Unsafe operations (4411596).)
Making both heap and direct buffers perform as well as arrays (or nearly so) is
critical to the performance of the java.nio subsystem.
-- mr@eng 2001/2/4
---- BBSpeed.java
import java.nio.*;
public class BBSpeed {
static final int SIZE = 4096;
static final int TRIALS = 4096;
static int sum(ByteBuffer bb) {
int n = bb.capacity();
int a = 0;
bb.rewind();
for (int j = 0; j < n; j++)
a += bb.get(j);
return a;
}
static int sumReverse(ByteBuffer bb) {
int n = bb.capacity();
int a = 0;
bb.rewind();
for (int j = n - 1; j >= 0; j--)
a += bb.get(j);
return a;
}
static int time(String name, ByteBuffer bb) {
int n = bb.capacity();
bb.limit(bb.capacity());
int a = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < TRIALS; i++) sum(bb);
long start = System.currentTimeMillis();
for (int i = 0; i < TRIALS; i++) sum(bb);
System.out.println(name + " " + (System.currentTimeMillis() - start));
for (int i = 0; i < TRIALS; i++) sumReverse(bb);
start = System.currentTimeMillis();
for (int i = 0; i < TRIALS; i++) sumReverse(bb);
System.out.println(name + " rev " + (System.currentTimeMillis() - start));
return a;
}
static int sum(byte[] ba) {
int n = ba.length;
int a = 0;
for (int j = 0; j < n; j++)
a += ba[j];
return a;
}
static int sumReverse(byte[] ba) {
int n = ba.length;
int a = 0;
for (int j = n - 1; j >= 0; j--)
a += ba[j];
return a;
}
static int timeArray() {
byte[] ba = new byte[SIZE];
int a = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < TRIALS; i++) a += sum(ba);
long start = System.currentTimeMillis();
for (int i = 0; i < TRIALS; i++) a += sum(ba);
System.out.println("array " + (System.currentTimeMillis() - start));
for (int i = 0; i < TRIALS; i++) a += sumReverse(ba);
start = System.currentTimeMillis();
for (int i = 0; i < TRIALS; i++) a += sumReverse(ba);
System.out.println("array rev " + (System.currentTimeMillis() - start));
return a;
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
String key = "hda";
if (args.length == 1)
key = args[0];
int a = 0;
if (key.indexOf('a') >= 0)
a += timeArray();
if (key.indexOf('h') >= 0)
a += time("heap", ByteBuffer.allocate(SIZE));
if (key.indexOf('d') >= 0)
a += time("direct", ByteBuffer.allocateDirect(SIZE));
System.exit(a);
}
}
- relates to
-
JDK-4401956 (cs) Precipitous drop in the Jetstream benchmark
- Resolved