-
Bug
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
P4
-
1.4.0
-
beta
-
generic
-
generic
-
Verified
|> > tags(String name) needs to specify the form of the
|> > name, using an example.
|> >
|> > I can never remember whether it is
|> > tags("@serial")
|> > or
|> > tags("serial")
|> >
|> > that gets me the tags of a specific kind.
|> >
|> > (I recall that Javadoc throws the "@" at me
|> > in some places, and requires it in some places,
|> > but I can never remember when it does or doesn't.)
|> >
|> To follow up on that:
|>
|> The Tag class gives an example showing name() and
|> text(). But the tags(String) method in a class
|> returns tags that match kind(). The tag class does
|> not give an example, or better yet a list, of the
|> possible values of kind().
|>
|> > name, using an example.
|> >
|> > I can never remember whether it is
|> > tags("@serial")
|> > or
|> > tags("serial")
|> >
|> > that gets me the tags of a specific kind.
|> >
|> > (I recall that Javadoc throws the "@" at me
|> > in some places, and requires it in some places,
|> > but I can never remember when it does or doesn't.)
|> >
|> To follow up on that:
|>
|> The Tag class gives an example showing name() and
|> text(). But the tags(String) method in a class
|> returns tags that match kind(). The tag class does
|> not give an example, or better yet a list, of the
|> possible values of kind().
|>