We sometimes generate diagnostics like

NestedInnerClassNames.java:19: NestedInnerClassNames is already defined in empty package
class NestedInnerClassNames {} // ERROR
^

(This example is from a regression test).

The name "empty package" is misleading. The package is not empty. There is no language concept
of an "empty package". The proper language term is "unnamed package" (7.4.2).

Please correct the diagnostics. The reference file for the regression test NestedInnerClassNames
will have to be updated as well.

neal.gafter@Eng 2001-03-15