The old PI doc, ptc/00-08-06 contained incorrect minor codes. That doc has been superceded by ptc/2001/03-04.


harold.carr@Eng 2001-04-10

Subject:
           Re: Bug in minor code in Interceptors chapter
       Date:
           Tue, 10 Apr 2001 12:12:13 -0400
      From:
           Jishnu Mukerji <###@###.###>
 Organization:
           Hewlett-Packard EIAL, Florham Park NJ USA
        To:
           Harold Carr <###@###.###>
   References:
           1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6




Harold Carr wrote:
>
> Hello Jishnu,
>
> > As a matter of fact, you can reconstruct what I should have said, given
> > the original document and orbrev/01-03-01 or ptc/01-03-04. The Chapter
>
> Not sure what you mean by the "original document". That's part of my
> confusion. The "off-by" numbers you originally gave seem to refer to
> ptc/2000-04-05, the final adopted spec, rather than ptc/2000-08-06, the
> spec as revised by FTF - which is the one you said was off.
>
> > and the minor codes as they appear in those two documents are correct
> > notwithstanding anything that I might have said earlier in an attempt to
> > describe what the differences are between the earlier document and these
> > documents. The numbers as they appear in these two documents are
> > consistent with the OMG minor code registry database that Andrew
> > maintains.
> >
> > However, if you still insist that I put together this description of the
> > delta:-), I will do so in a couple of days.
>
> I am trying to ensure that implementors (including SUN) get the minor
> codes right. From what I have been able to ascertain, there is nothing
> to change between ptc/2000-08-06 and ptc/2001-03-04 with respect to
> Interceptors, either minor codes or anything else.

You're right, I goofed. Supercede that message where I gave deltas and
replace it with Null delta.

Sorry.

Jishnu.