Uploaded image for project: 'JDK'
  1. JDK
  2. JDK-4494576

Need more flexible security management than "all-permissions"

XMLWordPrintable

    • Icon: Enhancement Enhancement
    • Resolution: Duplicate
    • Icon: P5 P5
    • None
    • 1.0.1
    • deploy
    • generic
    • generic



      Name: bsC130419 Date: 08/21/2001


      java version "1.3.1"
      Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.3.1-b24)
      Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.3.1-b24, mixed mode)

      The <security> tag in the JNLP file only gives the option for "all-
      permissions". It would often be more appropriate to request more fine-grained
      permission. For example, I cannot instantiate an ORB without all-permissions
      because the (Sun) ORB implementation wants to read the System properties and/or
      the ORB.properties file on the user's hard disk.

      Given the fine-grained nature of the policy files, it seems logical that a Web
      Start application could list the permissions it will require and have the user
      agree to those, without the blanket all-permissions option. I guess the XML
      implementation thought ahead on this but provided only the most simplistic
      case.

      It's the same as the problem with signed applets. Having gone to the trouble of
      implementing fine-grained permission, you only provide an all-or-none option.
      Please consider fixing this. I can see that it's not trivial but it would be a
      real boost for Web Start.
      (Review ID: 130363)
      ======================================================================

            rschmidtsunw Rene Schmidt (Inactive)
            bstrathesunw Bill Strathearn (Inactive)
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            0 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved:
              Imported:
              Indexed: