Uploaded image for project: 'JDK'
  1. JDK
  2. JDK-4700172

Manifest standard for locating interface implementations

    XMLWordPrintable

Details

    • Enhancement
    • Resolution: Duplicate
    • P4
    • None
    • 1.4.0
    • tools
    • jar
    • x86
    • linux

    Description



      Name: gm110360 Date: 06/10/2002


      FULL PRODUCT VERSION :
      [charisma mprudhom]$ java -version
      java version "1.4.0"
      Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.0-b92)
      Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.0-b92, mixed mode)


      FULL OPERATING SYSTEM VERSION :
      Linux charisma 2.4.17 #5 Tue Apr 9 16:19:04 EDT 2002 i686
      unknown

      A DESCRIPTION OF THE PROBLEM :
      A common problem for many applications that interoperate
      with other components is that there is no standard for
      locating implementations of common interfaces. For example,
      if I have an application that works with any JDBC driver, I
      have to either:

         1. Hardcore all the possible JDBC driver class names into
      my application, or
         2. Ask the user to enter the class name of their JDBC driver.
         3. Parse the classpath and scan through all the jar files
      and instantiate each class to check to see if it implements
      the java.sql.Driver interface.

      #1 and #3 are bad for obvious reasons. #2 is confusing to a
      user who is not technically inclined.

      One proposed solution would be very simple: just create a
      standard whereby the manifest of a jar file may contain a
      list of implementing classes that the jar author wants to
      advertise. For example, the JDBC driver for MySQL could contain:

      java.sql.Driver: org.gjt.mm.mysql.Driver


      Optionally, a method could be added to the
      java.util.jar.JarInputStream class that does something
      like:

        Class [] getImplementingClasses (Class interfaceClass)

      A standard like this would vastly improve the current
      situation with regards to component-based programming, and
      the implementation effort would be minimal: it would mostly
      involve documenting the standard.



      This bug can be reproduced always.
      (Review ID: 146517)
      ======================================================================

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          Activity

            People

              mr Mark Reinhold
              gmanwanisunw Girish Manwani (Inactive)
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              0 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:
                Imported:
                Indexed: