-
Bug
-
Resolution: Won't Fix
-
P4
-
5.0
-
generic
-
generic
Java Version: 1.5.0-beta-b24, b23 and b22
Platforms: win2003, winXP, sparc8, IA9 and AMD64
System Infomation:
1. windows 2003
host name: bunt.sfbay AMD 64-based PC, 2 CUPs
video cards: gateway VX900 on standand VGA Graphics Adapter
1024X768 pixels, High 32 bit
2. windows XP-pro SP1 5.1.2600
host name: hasselblad.sfbay Dell Precision workstation 340
video cards: Dell M990 on nVidia Quadro 2 Ex
1024X768 pixels, High 32 bit
3. RHAS21 2.4.9-2 24
host name: inclusion.sfbay Dell Precision 420
video cards: nVidia RIVA TNT 2
4. solaris-sparc 8 Generic_108528-23
host name: aditi.sfbay ultra 10, sun4u
video cards: creator 3D
5. solaris-IA9 generic_112234-07
host name: daikon.sfbay SunCoblat LX50 i86PC
Desktop: CDE1.5.4, X11 version 6.6.1
Problems:
The J2DBench tests (some Image tests) are much solwer than 1.4.2-b28 in tiger 1.5.0-beta-b24, b23, and b22.
1.5.0-beta-b20 is OK in general.
Please see attached the html files for each platform's score and see which tests are much slower. Some tests are 90% slower than 1.4.2-b28.
For Example, DrawImage test using 100x100 ICM8 Opaque image scaled 1.5x is 95% slower than 1.4.2 in winXP;
DrawImage test using 100x100 xBGR Bitmask image without Scaling is 81% slower than 1.4.2 insparc8.
Platforms: win2003, winXP, sparc8, IA9 and AMD64
System Infomation:
1. windows 2003
host name: bunt.sfbay AMD 64-based PC, 2 CUPs
video cards: gateway VX900 on standand VGA Graphics Adapter
1024X768 pixels, High 32 bit
2. windows XP-pro SP1 5.1.2600
host name: hasselblad.sfbay Dell Precision workstation 340
video cards: Dell M990 on nVidia Quadro 2 Ex
1024X768 pixels, High 32 bit
3. RHAS21 2.4.9-2 24
host name: inclusion.sfbay Dell Precision 420
video cards: nVidia RIVA TNT 2
4. solaris-sparc 8 Generic_108528-23
host name: aditi.sfbay ultra 10, sun4u
video cards: creator 3D
5. solaris-IA9 generic_112234-07
host name: daikon.sfbay SunCoblat LX50 i86PC
Desktop: CDE1.5.4, X11 version 6.6.1
Problems:
The J2DBench tests (some Image tests) are much solwer than 1.4.2-b28 in tiger 1.5.0-beta-b24, b23, and b22.
1.5.0-beta-b20 is OK in general.
Please see attached the html files for each platform's score and see which tests are much slower. Some tests are 90% slower than 1.4.2-b28.
For Example, DrawImage test using 100x100 ICM8 Opaque image scaled 1.5x is 95% slower than 1.4.2 in winXP;
DrawImage test using 100x100 xBGR Bitmask image without Scaling is 81% slower than 1.4.2 insparc8.