Uploaded image for project: 'JDK'
  1. JDK
  2. JDK-4959717

JVM crash with error "Fatal: null exception in compiled code"

XMLWordPrintable

    • Icon: Bug Bug
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Icon: P2 P2
    • 1.3.1_12
    • 1.3.1, 1.4.2_01, 1.4.2_04
    • hotspot
    • 12
    • x86, sparc
    • solaris_7, solaris_8, windows_2000

        customer is running an intel server farm running Solaris 8 X86.
        They started experiencing this in May. It's progressively gotten worse. Upto 80 outagages a month at one point.

        Initially every crash ended with a truncated core file of only about 10% of what it should have been.

        It was not until the use of -XX:+ShowMessageBoxOnError that we were able to collect a pstack, pmap and gcore of the failing process
        A> What I see in the log file :
        #
        # HotSpot Virtual Machine Error, Internal Error
        # Please report this error at
        # http://java.sun.com/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi
        #
        # Java VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (1.4.2_01-b06 mixed mode)
        #
        # Error ID: 53484152454432554E54494D450E435050018D
        #
        # Problematic Thread: prio=5 tid=0x08396a80 nid=0x25 runnable
        #
        Internal Error
        Fatal: null exception in compiled code

        Do you want to debug the problem?

        All data collected is in /net/cores.ebay/cores/63833818
        the cores are in the 24nov and 25nov sub directories.

        interesting in the pstacks(this one is from the 25nov crash
        there are several threads signitures

        ----------------- lwp# 29 / thread# 28 --------------------
         dfac892c nanosleep (95a6e9d0, 95a6e9c8)
         dfb87f90 __nanosleep (64) + 58
         debced77 __1cCosOinfinite_sleep6F_v_ () + 17
         dead5697 __1cMreport_error6Fipkci11E_v_ (1, dec90008, 18d, dec647fc, dec647f0,
        95a6f35c) + 423
         dead4fc9 __1cMreport_fatal6Fpkci1E_v_ (dec90008, 18d, dec8ffe8) + 49
         de8fa3af __1cNSharedRuntimebGcompute_exception_return_address6Fi_pC_ (1) + 22d
         da034111 ???????? ()
        ----------------- lwp# 30 / thread# 29 --------------------

        ----------------- lwp# 45 / thread# 44 --------------------
         dfac892c nanosleep (9574e494, 9574e48c)
         dfb87f90 __nanosleep (64) + 58
         debcf817 __1cCosLmessage_box6Fpkc2_i_ (dec647fc, 9574ea00) + 56
         dead5638 __1cMreport_error6Fipkci11E_v_ (1, dec90008, 18d, dec647fc, dec647f0,
        9574f22c) + 3c4
         dead4fc9 __1cMreport_fatal6Fpkci1E_v_ (dec90008, 18d, dec8ffe8) + 49
         de8fa3af __1cNSharedRuntimebGcompute_exception_return_address6Fi_pC_ (1) + 22d
         da034111 ???????? ()
        ----------------- lwp# 47 / thread# 46 --------------------


        ----------------- lwp# 56 / thread# 55 --------------------
         dfac892c nanosleep (9501e890, 9501e888)
         dfb87f90 __nanosleep (64) + 58
         debced77 __1cCosOinfinite_sleep6F_v_ () + 17
         dead52af __1cMreport_error6Fipkci11E_v_ (1, dec90008, 18d, dec647fc, dec647f0,
        9501f21c) + 3b
         dead4fc9 __1cMreport_fatal6Fpkci1E_v_ (dec90008, 18d, dec8ffe8) + 49
         de8fa3af __1cNSharedRuntimebGcompute_exception_return_address6Fi_pC_ (1) + 22d
         da034111 ???????? ()
        ----------------- lwp# 59 / thread# 58 --------------------

              rasbold Chuck Rasbold
              msusko Mark Susko (Inactive)
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              0 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:
                Imported:
                Indexed: