###@###.### 2003-12-17
J2SE Version (please include all output from java -version flag):
java version "1.5.0-beta"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.5.0-beta-b30)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.5.0-beta-b30, mixed mode)
Does this problem occur on J2SE 1.3 or 1.4.x? Yes / No (pick one)
No, 1.4.2 only takes 1 sec. b30 takes 18 sec.
Operating System Configuration Information (be specific):
Windows XP (version 5.1 Service Pack 1 (Build 2600))
Hardware Configuration Information (be specific):
Platform configuration:
CPU: Intel 32bit Single Processor
Processor Speed: 1893 MHz
Operating System:
Windows XP (version 5.1 Service Pack 1 (Build 2600))
DirectX version: DirectX 8.1 or greater
DirectX display devices:
Device 0:
Resolution (width x height x depth): 1024 x 768 x 32
Device driver nv4_disp.dll version 6.13.10.3638
GDI display devices:
Primary: Name = \\.\DISPLAY1, Description = NVIDIA GeForce4 460 Go (Toshiba)
Bug Description:
Testing the VisualMust debugger with B30, there is a problem :
when running the application step by step and entering into a "super()"
to create a frame for example, the step takes 18 seconds and 100 % CPU
(with a Pentium 4, 1900 MHz). With the same machine, with Java 1.4.2.
the step takes less than 1 second.
Steps to Reproduce (be specific):
- unzip VisualMust.zip
- run java -Xmx128m -classpath ./VisualMust.jar;./VisualMustDocs.jar;./JbcBeansEvaluation.jar;c:/jdk/lib/tools.jar VisualMust
- relates to
-
JDK-4990399 JDWP: JFrame construction performance regression over 1.4.2 (method entry err?)
- Closed