Uploaded image for project: 'JDK'
  1. JDK
  2. JDK-5110295

Confusing statements in the AWT Focus specs

XMLWordPrintable

    • Icon: Bug Bug
    • Resolution: Duplicate
    • Icon: P3 P3
    • None
    • 5.0
    • client-libs
    • sparc
    • solaris_8

      The AWT Focus spec, section Pogrammatic Traversal, states:

        Also note that hiding or disabling the focus owner, directly or indirectly
        via an ancestor, or making the focus owner non-displayable or non-focusable,
        initiates an automatic, forward focus traversal. While hiding any ancestor,
        lightweight or heavyweight, will always indirectly hide its children, only
        disabling a heavyweight ancestor will disable its children. Thus, disabling
        a lightweight ancestor of the focus owner does not automatically initiate a
        focus traversal.

      There are several questions about this section:

      - It's unclear why disabling the focus owner initiates a traversal, because
        according to the spec, "A disabled Component may be the focus owner" (see
        section Requesting Focus).

      - It states an important difference between disabling a lightweight container
        and disabling a heavyweight one. Is it really true? I couldn't find anything
        about it in the javadoc. However, the Chan/Lee book (2nd Edition) doesn't
        mention any differences. What's more confusing, this book (p.422) states
        that children of a disabled container will not receive any input events
        yet retain the enabled appearance.

      It would be very useful to clarify behavior for enabling/disabling containers
      for all possible scenarios (lightwight/heavyweight ancestors, lightweight/
      heavyweight children). I realize this may look like a different issue, but
      the Focus spec is the only place so far that mentions it.

      ###@###.### 2004-10-01

            ant Anton Tarasov (Inactive)
            savzan Stanislav Avzan (Inactive)
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            0 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved:
              Imported:
              Indexed: