Uploaded image for project: 'JDK'
  1. JDK
  2. JDK-6178071

(cal) REGRESSION: GregorianCalendar.set(Calendar.HOUR, ...) has no effect

    XMLWordPrintable

Details

    • Bug
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • P3
    • 6
    • 5.0, 5.0u5
    • core-libs
    • b53
    • x86, sparc
    • linux, solaris_10, windows_xp

    Backports

      Description

        FULL PRODUCT VERSION :
        java version "1.5.0-rc"
        Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.5.0-rc-b63)
        Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.5.0-rc-b63, mixed mode, sharing)

        A DESCRIPTION OF THE PROBLEM :
        Setting the 'HOUR' field of a freshly created GregorianCalendar has no effect on the Date value returned by a subsequent call to getTime().
        You have to call getTime() at least once before setting the 'HOUR' field to make it work.
        There is no problem with setting the 'HOUR_OF_DAY' field

        STEPS TO FOLLOW TO REPRODUCE THE PROBLEM :
        Compile and run the test code under jdk 1.5 , watch the output to stdout.

        It does work in prior releases of the VM (at least up to 1.4.2_04)

        EXPECTED VERSUS ACTUAL BEHAVIOR :
        EXPECTED -
        Date: Thu Jan 01 01:00:00 CET 2004

        ACTUAL -
        Date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 CET 2004


        REPRODUCIBILITY :
        This bug can be reproduced always.

        ---------- BEGIN SOURCE ----------
        import java.util.*;

        public class CalTest {
           public CalTest() {}

           public static void main(String[] args) {
              GregorianCalendar cal = new GregorianCalendar(2004, 0,1);
        // activating this line makes it work!
        // cal.getTime();
              cal.set(Calendar.HOUR, 1);
              System.out.println("Date: " + cal.getTime());
           }
        }
        ---------- END SOURCE ----------

        CUSTOMER SUBMITTED WORKAROUND :
        Call getTime() in advance or use HOUR_OF_DAY instead.

        Release Regression From : 1.4.2
        The above release value was the last known release where this
        bug was known to work. Since then there has been a regression.
        ###@###.### 10/12/04 21:56 GMT

        Attachments

          Issue Links

            Activity

              People

                okutsu Masayoshi Okutsu
                gmanwanisunw Girish Manwani (Inactive)
                Votes:
                0 Vote for this issue
                Watchers:
                0 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                  Created:
                  Updated:
                  Resolved:
                  Imported:
                  Indexed: