-
Bug
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
P2
-
solaris_10, 5.0u1
-
b07
-
generic, sparc
-
solaris, solaris_10, solaris_11
-
Not verified
Issue | Fix Version | Assignee | Priority | Status | Resolution | Resolved In Build |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JDK-2121436 | 6 | Joseph Kowalski | P2 | Closed | Fixed | b16 |
The code present in the postinstall and preremove scripts to determine the underlying Solaris release isn't robust in all cases. In particular, it gets
confused by Micro release nomenclature (since we haven't done a Micro release
in 8 years). We still probably won't be releasing a Micro release of Solaris,
but the development environment for the next Solaris release currently
identifies itself as VERSION=10.1 (uname -r = 5.10.1).
###@###.### 2004-11-16 20:00:28 GMT
confused by Micro release nomenclature (since we haven't done a Micro release
in 8 years). We still probably won't be releasing a Micro release of Solaris,
but the development environment for the next Solaris release currently
identifies itself as VERSION=10.1 (uname -r = 5.10.1).
###@###.### 2004-11-16 20:00:28 GMT
- backported by
-
JDK-2121436 Java default selection not robust on Micro release
-
- Closed
-
- duplicates
-
JDK-6200749 Large regressions evident in Solaris Nevada Build 01 for JVM benchmarks
-
- Closed
-