Should all *inherited* methods (static and non-static) be grouped
together as proposed in 4619333:

      Methods
         Static (non-factory) methods
         Instance methods
         Inherited methods

or should they be separated?

If not separated, maybe it would suffice to make them stand out (bold?).

Here's a proposal to separate them. They are currently presented
like this:

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Methods inherited from class java.awt.Container

add, add, add, add, add, addContainerListener, addImpl,
addPropertyChangeListener, addPropertyChangeListener,
applyComponentOrientation, areFocusTraversalKeysSet,
countComponents, deliverEvent, doLayout, findComponentAt,
findComponentAt, getAlignmentX, getAlignmentY, getComponent,
getComponentAt, getComponentAt, getComponentCount, getComponents,
getComponentZOrder, getContainerListeners, getFocusTraversalKeys,
getFocusTraversalPolicy, getInsets, getLayout, getListeners,
getMaximumSize, getMinimumSize, getMousePosition, getPreferredSize,
insets, invalidate, isAncestorOf, isFocusCycleRoot, isFocusCycleRoot,
isFocusTraversalPolicyProvider, isFocusTraversalPolicySet, layout
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Here they are separated by static: (I didn't bother to actually separate
the proper methods)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Methods inherited from class java.awt.Container

static: add, add, add, add, add, addContainerListener, addImpl,
            addPropertyChangeListener, addPropertyChangeListener,
            applyComponentOrientation, areFocusTraversalKeysSet,
            countComponents, deliverEvent, doLayout, findComponentAt
non-static: getAlignmentY, getComponent, getComponentAt, getComponentAt,
            getComponentCount, getComponents, getComponentZOrder,
            getContainerListeners, getFocusTraversalKeys,
            getInsets, getLayout, getListeners, getMaximumSize
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

###@###.### 2005-1-07 01:59:03 GMT