FULL PRODUCT VERSION :
java version "1.5.0"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.5.0-b64)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.5.0-b64, mixed mode, sharing)

java version "1.6.0-ea"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.6.0-ea-b40)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.6.0-ea-b40, mixed mode, sharing)


ADDITIONAL OS VERSION INFORMATION :
Microsoft Windows XP [version 5.1.2600]

A DESCRIPTION OF THE PROBLEM :
Currrent javac implementation doesn't permit
in its parser to create an array of a inner class that have
a generic enclosing class.

see Foo example after :

inner = new Foo<?>.Inner[10];
or
inner = new Foo<Object>.Inner[10];

can't be parsed by the compiler.

This problem come from comments on the Scott Violet weblog :
(http://weblogs.java.net/blog/zixle/archive/2005/08/should_we_gener_1.html)
and i don't see why it's not syntactically and semantically correct.

Reading the JL3 grammar, it seems legal :
new Foo<?>.Inner[10] is :
'new'
ClassOrInterfaceType
    (ClassOrInterfaceType(TypeName('Foo') TypeArguments('<?>')) '.'
Identifier('Inner'))
DimExprs('[10]')

so it's syntactically legal.

I think it semantically valid for the same reason that
new List<?>[10] is valid.


STEPS TO FOLLOW TO REPRODUCE THE PROBLEM :
compile the Foo class.

EXPECTED VERSUS ACTUAL BEHAVIOR :
EXPECTED -
it compiles.
ACTUAL -
it doesn't compile.

ERROR MESSAGES/STACK TRACES THAT OCCUR :
C:\eclipse\workspace\java-patch\src>javac Foo.java
Foo.java:11: '(' or '[' expected
        inner = new Foo<?>.Inner[10];
                          ^
1 error


---------- BEGIN SOURCE ----------
public class Foo<T> {
    private T t;
    private Foo<?>.Inner[] inner;
    public Foo(T t) {
        this.t = t;
        inner = new Foo<?>.Inner[10];
    }
    private class Inner {
    }
}
---------- END SOURCE ----------

CUSTOMER SUBMITTED WORKAROUND :
use a raw type instead :

public class Foo<T> {
    private T t;
    private Foo<?>.Inner[] inner;
    public Foo(T t) {
        this.t = t;
        inner = new Foo.Inner[10];
    }
    private class Inner {
    }
}