-
Bug
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
P3
-
6
-
b81
-
generic
-
generic
There are a number of problems with the Makefile that generates the javadoc
that winds up in the docs bundle:
- The header and title blocks end with "beta2-b78 Draft (build b78)",
which is redundant (this is due to a merge error made back in May
2005).
- The current year is hardwired to 2005; it should instead be computed
in the makefile.
- "TM"s are written with <sup><font size=-2>TM</font></sup>; instead
they should just be &\#x2122.
- The descriptive comment on the main overview page still says "Java 2
Platform"; the "2" should be removed.
- The packages are split into "Java SE Platform Packages" and "Other
packages", but all of the packages on this page are in fact part of
the platform, so this division is misleading.
- The logic that tests whether MILESTONE == fcs and omits the build
number is incorrect, and doesn't actually omit the build number for
an FCS build.
- The javadoc invocation flags don't ignore the @spec and @revised tags.
that winds up in the docs bundle:
- The header and title blocks end with "beta2-b78 Draft (build b78)",
which is redundant (this is due to a merge error made back in May
2005).
- The current year is hardwired to 2005; it should instead be computed
in the makefile.
- "TM"s are written with <sup><font size=-2>TM</font></sup>; instead
they should just be &\#x2122.
- The descriptive comment on the main overview page still says "Java 2
Platform"; the "2" should be removed.
- The packages are split into "Java SE Platform Packages" and "Other
packages", but all of the packages on this page are in fact part of
the platform, so this division is misleading.
- The logic that tests whether MILESTONE == fcs and omits the build
number is incorrect, and doesn't actually omit the build number for
an FCS build.
- The javadoc invocation flags don't ignore the @spec and @revised tags.