Uploaded image for project: 'JDK'
  1. JDK
  2. JDK-6410256

LTP: Possible backward incompatibility in DefaultPersistenceDelegate

XMLWordPrintable

    • Icon: Bug Bug
    • Resolution: Won't Fix
    • Icon: P3 P3
    • None
    • 6
    • client-libs
    • None
    • generic
    • generic

      Scott Violet wrote:

      I think we should consider putting the code that dug out fields back :(
      The important thing is none of our public API relies on it, so that you can persist any public classes in a sandbox without reflection hacks. Developers that want to use LTP to persist private fields, should be allowed to, assuming they have the right permissions.

      Shannon Hickey wrote:

      What do you think about reverting part of your change for compatibility reasons? That is, favor field access if you have the right permissions, otherwise use getters.

            malenkov Sergey Malenkov (Inactive)
            malenkov Sergey Malenkov (Inactive)
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            0 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved:
              Imported:
              Indexed: