FULL PRODUCT VERSION :
java version "1.5.0_07"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.5.0_07-b03)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 1.5.0_07-b03, mixed mode)


ADDITIONAL OS VERSION INFORMATION :
Linux ubuntu 2.6.12-10-amd64-xeon #1 SMP Fri Apr 28 13:33:06 UTC 2006 x86_64 GNU/Linux

A DESCRIPTION OF THE PROBLEM :
You can add a ChangeListener to a JSpinner and any changes to the spinner's model will result in a ChangeEvent being generated by the spinner as well. If you replace the spinner's model with a new one, the old model should not still be linked to the spinner in any way. But it is...try the test app below.

STEPS TO FOLLOW TO REPRODUCE THE PROBLEM :
Please see the attached test program. Run with and without the indicated line in the code.


REPRODUCIBILITY :
This bug can be reproduced always.

---------- BEGIN SOURCE ----------
import javax.swing.JSpinner;
import javax.swing.SpinnerDateModel;
import javax.swing.SpinnerNumberModel;
import javax.swing.event.ChangeEvent;
import javax.swing.event.ChangeListener;

public class JSpinnerBug implements ChangeListener {

  public JSpinnerBug()
  {
    SpinnerNumberModel m1 = new SpinnerNumberModel();
    JSpinner s = new JSpinner(m1);
    s.addChangeListener(this);
    SpinnerDateModel m2 = new SpinnerDateModel();
    s.setModel(m2);
    
    // m1 is no longer linked to the JSpinner (it has been replaced by m2), so
    // the following should not trigger a call to our stateChanged() method...
    m1.setValue(new Integer(1));
    // try running with the above line commented out and compare the result.
  }
    
  public void stateChanged(ChangeEvent e)
  {
    System.out.println("stateChanged(" + e.getSource() + ")");
  }

  public static void main(String[] args)
  {
    JSpinnerBug bug = new JSpinnerBug();
  }
}
---------- END SOURCE ----------