-
Bug
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
P2
-
1.4.2_13, 5.0
-
b05
-
sparc
-
solaris_8
-
Verified
Issue | Fix Version | Assignee | Priority | Status | Resolution | Resolved In Build |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JDK-2230509 | 5.0-pool | Kevin Walls | P3 | Closed | Won't Fix | |
JDK-2179791 | 1.4.2_23 | Chris Phillips | P3 | Closed | Fixed | b01 |
JDK-2179620 | 1.4.2_22-rev | Chris Phillips | P2 | Closed | Fixed | b03 |
Customer is seeing crashes in compiled code. They are running with 1.4.2_13 -server on Solaris 8 with T2 libthread.
In hs_err_pid3035.log attached, it shows
# Problematic frame:
# v ~StubRoutines::partial_subtype_check
(dbx) where -l 10
current thread: t@329
[1] libc.so.1:__lwp_kill(0x0, 0x149, 0x0, 0xff33c008, 0xff386000, 0x0), at 0xff31f6d4
[2] libc.so.1:raise(0x6, 0x0, 0x0, 0xffffffff, 0xff3403c4, 0x0), at 0xff2cbdbc
[3] libc.so.1:abort(0xff33c008, 0x1, 0x1, 0xff180969, 0x1, 0x414c18), at 0xff2b5a54
[4] libjvm.so:os::abort(0x1, 0xff180969, 0x1, 0x7efefeff, 0x81010100, 0xff00), at 0xff0ba674
[5] libjvm.so:VMError::report_and_die(0xff196cbc, 0xff196ccb, 0xff196cdb, 0xfa000958, 0x4bdfdb80, 0x4bdfd8c8), at 0xff11f9e8
[6] libjvm.so:JVM_handle_solaris_signal(0xfa000958, 0xfa000958, 0xff18046d, 0xeb988000, 0x4be00000, 0x4be00000), at 0xfeddb118
[7] libthread.so.1:__sighndlr(0xb, 0x4bdfdb80, 0x4bdfd8c8, 0xfedda6cc, 0x0, 0x0), at 0xff374f94
---- called from signal handler with signal 11 (SIGSEGV) ------
=>[8] 0xfa000958(0x6bf9ada8, 0x6a8740a0, 0x6bf72450, 0x89928848, 0x0, 0x0), at 0xfa000958
[9] 0xfa3e2b24(0x6bf9ae30, 0x0, 0x6a8740a0, 0x0, 0x0, 0xe90472d8), at 0xfa3e2b24
[10] 0xfa40e14c(0x6bf9af30, 0x6bf72450, 0x89928848, 0x0, 0x0, 0x890ab590), at 0xfa40e14c
....
(dbx) dis 0xfa000900, 0xfa000958
0xfa000900: inc -16, %sp
0xfa000904: st %l0, [%sp + 64]
0xfa000908: st %l1, [%sp + 68]
0xfa00090c: st %l2, [%sp + 72]
0xfa000910: st %l3, [%sp + 76]
0xfa000914: ld [%o1 + 20], %l3
0xfa000918: ld [%l3 + 8], %l0
0xfa00091c: add %l3, 12, %l1
0xfa000920: clr %l3
0xfa000924: ld [%l1], %l2
0xfa000928: nop
0xfa00092c: nop
0xfa000930: nop
0xfa000934: nop
0xfa000938: nop
0xfa00093c: nop
0xfa000940: inc 4, %l1
0xfa000944: cmp %l3, %l0
0xfa000948: be,pn %icc,0xfa000978 ! 0xfa000978
0xfa00094c: inc %l3
0xfa000950: subcc %l2, %o2, %o0
0xfa000954: bne,pt %icc,0xfa000940 ! 0xfa000940
0xfa000958: ld [%l1], %l2
(dbx) x $l1
0xeb988000: dbx: core file read error: address 0xeb988000 not in data space
Looking at the pmap output,
68FC0000 192K read
69000000 2139680K read/write/exec
F9020000 352K read
2139680K == 0x82988000
0x69000000
+) 0xeb988000
Seems like we went past this limit.
In hs_err_pid3035.log attached, it shows
# Problematic frame:
# v ~StubRoutines::partial_subtype_check
(dbx) where -l 10
current thread: t@329
[1] libc.so.1:__lwp_kill(0x0, 0x149, 0x0, 0xff33c008, 0xff386000, 0x0), at 0xff31f6d4
[2] libc.so.1:raise(0x6, 0x0, 0x0, 0xffffffff, 0xff3403c4, 0x0), at 0xff2cbdbc
[3] libc.so.1:abort(0xff33c008, 0x1, 0x1, 0xff180969, 0x1, 0x414c18), at 0xff2b5a54
[4] libjvm.so:os::abort(0x1, 0xff180969, 0x1, 0x7efefeff, 0x81010100, 0xff00), at 0xff0ba674
[5] libjvm.so:VMError::report_and_die(0xff196cbc, 0xff196ccb, 0xff196cdb, 0xfa000958, 0x4bdfdb80, 0x4bdfd8c8), at 0xff11f9e8
[6] libjvm.so:JVM_handle_solaris_signal(0xfa000958, 0xfa000958, 0xff18046d, 0xeb988000, 0x4be00000, 0x4be00000), at 0xfeddb118
[7] libthread.so.1:__sighndlr(0xb, 0x4bdfdb80, 0x4bdfd8c8, 0xfedda6cc, 0x0, 0x0), at 0xff374f94
---- called from signal handler with signal 11 (SIGSEGV) ------
=>[8] 0xfa000958(0x6bf9ada8, 0x6a8740a0, 0x6bf72450, 0x89928848, 0x0, 0x0), at 0xfa000958
[9] 0xfa3e2b24(0x6bf9ae30, 0x0, 0x6a8740a0, 0x0, 0x0, 0xe90472d8), at 0xfa3e2b24
[10] 0xfa40e14c(0x6bf9af30, 0x6bf72450, 0x89928848, 0x0, 0x0, 0x890ab590), at 0xfa40e14c
....
(dbx) dis 0xfa000900, 0xfa000958
0xfa000900: inc -16, %sp
0xfa000904: st %l0, [%sp + 64]
0xfa000908: st %l1, [%sp + 68]
0xfa00090c: st %l2, [%sp + 72]
0xfa000910: st %l3, [%sp + 76]
0xfa000914: ld [%o1 + 20], %l3
0xfa000918: ld [%l3 + 8], %l0
0xfa00091c: add %l3, 12, %l1
0xfa000920: clr %l3
0xfa000924: ld [%l1], %l2
0xfa000928: nop
0xfa00092c: nop
0xfa000930: nop
0xfa000934: nop
0xfa000938: nop
0xfa00093c: nop
0xfa000940: inc 4, %l1
0xfa000944: cmp %l3, %l0
0xfa000948: be,pn %icc,0xfa000978 ! 0xfa000978
0xfa00094c: inc %l3
0xfa000950: subcc %l2, %o2, %o0
0xfa000954: bne,pt %icc,0xfa000940 ! 0xfa000940
0xfa000958: ld [%l1], %l2
(dbx) x $l1
0xeb988000: dbx: core file read error: address 0xeb988000 not in data space
Looking at the pmap output,
68FC0000 192K read
69000000 2139680K read/write/exec
F9020000 352K read
2139680K == 0x82988000
0x69000000
+) 0xeb988000
Seems like we went past this limit.
- backported by
-
JDK-2179620 j2sdk1.4.2_13 /server crash in ~StubRoutines::partial_subtype_check
- Closed
-
JDK-2179791 j2sdk1.4.2_13 /server crash in ~StubRoutines::partial_subtype_check
- Closed
-
JDK-2230509 j2sdk1.4.2_13 /server crash in ~StubRoutines::partial_subtype_check
- Closed
- relates to
-
JDK-8039068 Java 5u55 (64bit) crashes in StubRoutines::partial_subtype_check
- Resolved