Issue | Fix Version | Assignee | Priority | Status | Resolution | Resolved In Build |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JDK-2177069 | 7 | Vladimir Kozlov | P3 | Closed | Fixed | b22 |
JDK-2172506 | 6u10 | Vladimir Kozlov | P3 | Resolved | Fixed | b09 |
After the fix for 6464263 I ran with -XX:+VerifyDUIterators and found an other bug
(got the assert) in my changes. It caused by the use of DUIterator_Last in
ConvI2L::Ideal() I added in my changes:
(DUIterator_Last imin, i = last_outs(imin); i >= imin; --i)
Regualar DUIterator should be used instead.
(got the assert) in my changes. It caused by the use of DUIterator_Last in
ConvI2L::Ideal() I added in my changes:
(DUIterator_Last imin, i = last_outs(imin); i >= imin; --i)
Regualar DUIterator should be used instead.
- backported by
-
JDK-2172506 -XX:+VerifyDUIterators assert(_del_tick == node->_del_tick,"no unexpected deletions allowed")
-
- Resolved
-
-
JDK-2177069 -XX:+VerifyDUIterators assert(_del_tick == node->_del_tick,"no unexpected deletions allowed")
-
- Closed
-