| Issue | Fix Version | Assignee | Priority | Status | Resolution | Resolved In Build |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JDK-2183210 | 7 | Changpeng Fang | P4 | Closed | Fixed | b72 |
| JDK-2190023 | 6u21 | Tom Rodriguez | P4 | Resolved | Fixed | b01 |
Currently we use DebugInfoWriteStream/DebugInfoReadStream to record the reexecute bit by compress the reexecute bit
into bci. This makes the code look weird :
read_bci_and_reexecute(bool& reexecute);
write_bci_and_reexecute(int bci, bool reexecute);
It also makes the future addition of debuginfo difficult.
We can use pcDesc to record the reexecute bit, and then map it scopeDesc when a scopeDesc object is created.
into bci. This makes the code look weird :
read_bci_and_reexecute(bool& reexecute);
write_bci_and_reexecute(int bci, bool reexecute);
It also makes the future addition of debuginfo difficult.
We can use pcDesc to record the reexecute bit, and then map it scopeDesc when a scopeDesc object is created.
- backported by
-
JDK-2190023 Modify reexecute implementation to use pcDesc to record the reexecute bit
-
- Resolved
-
-
-
- Closed
-
- relates to
-
JDK-6889869 assert(!Interpreter::bytecode_should_reexecute(code),"should not reexecute")
-
- Closed
-