Issue | Fix Version | Assignee | Priority | Status | Resolution | Resolved In Build |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JDK-2196665 | 7 | Tony Printezis | P3 | Closed | Fixed | b104 |
JDK-2197838 | 6u23 | Tony Printezis | P3 | Resolved | Fixed | b01 |
JDK-2199738 | 6u22m | Tony Printezis | P3 | Resolved | Fixed | b01 |
JDK-2197547 | 6u21p | Tony Printezis | P3 | Resolved | Fixed | b03 |
- backported by
-
JDK-2197547 G1: explicit GCs are not always handled correctly
- Resolved
-
JDK-2197838 G1: explicit GCs are not always handled correctly
- Resolved
-
JDK-2199738 G1: explicit GCs are not always handled correctly
- Resolved
-
JDK-2196665 G1: explicit GCs are not always handled correctly
- Closed
- duplicates
-
JDK-6936185 assert(has_cp_cache(i),"oob") at vm/interpreter/rewriter.hpp:42
- Closed
- relates to
-
JDK-7000497 G1: SIGSEGV in java.lang.ref.Finalizer$1.<init>(Ljava/lang/Runnable;)V+0
- Closed
-
JDK-7000559 G1: assertion failure !outer || (full_collections_started == _full_collections_completed + 1)
- Closed
-
JDK-8321443 Develop tests for cases in 6944166 G1: explicit GCs are not always handled correctly
- Open
-
JDK-6963209 G1: remove the concept of abandoned pauses
- Closed