-
Bug
-
Resolution: Duplicate
-
P2
-
None
-
7, 8
-
generic, x86
-
generic, windows_xp
| Issue | Fix Version | Assignee | Priority | Status | Resolution | Resolved In Build |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JDK-2221953 | 7-pool | Sean Coffey | P3 | Closed | Won't Fix |
Doug Lea reports:
We finally got to a corner case that we left (literally!)
hanging in Phaser -- what to do when multiple sub-phasers register
and deregister such that they try to "steal" each others
registrations. This is a crazy thing for a user to do -- the
outcome will be non-deterministic, and isn't (and cannot
be) spec'ed tightly, but the code was left
as possibly freezing, which is not a nice thing to do.
But now is addressed in CVS update, along with enabling
a previously commented out test method in tck/PhaserTest.
We finally got to a corner case that we left (literally!)
hanging in Phaser -- what to do when multiple sub-phasers register
and deregister such that they try to "steal" each others
registrations. This is a crazy thing for a user to do -- the
outcome will be non-deterministic, and isn't (and cannot
be) spec'ed tightly, but the code was left
as possibly freezing, which is not a nice thing to do.
But now is addressed in CVS update, along with enabling
a previously commented out test method in tck/PhaserTest.
- backported by
-
JDK-2221953 Phaser can hang in extreme cases with sub-Phaser registration
-
- Closed
-
- duplicates
-
-
- Closed
-