-
Bug
-
Resolution: Cannot Reproduce
-
P3
-
7
-
x86
-
os_x
| Issue | Fix Version | Assignee | Priority | Status | Resolution | Resolved In Build |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JDK-2223198 | 7u6 | Anthony Petrov | P3 | Closed | Cannot Reproduce |
Mac OS X macmini4,1
Run a regression test closed/java/awt/BasicStroke/DashZeroWidth.java
There, a Frame has a default layout without size set, and a Canvas is added which has no max/min/preferred size defined but just setSize(200,40).
With b224, it is displayed properly, 200x40+decorations size, and always pass (AFAIK). With b226, however, it has a minimal possible width (a few pixels) and height of decorations thus being virtually invisible. In this situation, the test fails more often than not.
Now, should it be fixed? If yes, it's a regression and priority should be bigger; if no, let's discuss specifications.
Run a regression test closed/java/awt/BasicStroke/DashZeroWidth.java
There, a Frame has a default layout without size set, and a Canvas is added which has no max/min/preferred size defined but just setSize(200,40).
With b224, it is displayed properly, 200x40+decorations size, and always pass (AFAIK). With b226, however, it has a minimal possible width (a few pixels) and height of decorations thus being virtually invisible. In this situation, the test fails more often than not.
Now, should it be fixed? If yes, it's a regression and priority should be bigger; if no, let's discuss specifications.
- backported by
-
JDK-2223198 [macosx] Frame has minimal possible size with default layout and setSize()d child
-
- Closed
-
- relates to
-
-
- Closed
-
-
-
- Closed
-
-
-
- Closed
-