| Issue | Fix Version | Assignee | Priority | Status | Resolution | Resolved In Build |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JDK-8017373 | 6u65 | Unassigned | P3 | Closed | Fixed | b01 |
In src/share/vm/gc_implementation/shared/gcTraceTime.cpp:
+ gclog_or_tty->date_stamp(PrintGCDateStamps);
+ gclog_or_tty->stamp(PrintGCDateStamps);
The second added line should be PrintGCTimeStamp
Example:
% ./jdk6u-dev_hotspot-build/bin/java -Xmx2m -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC -XX:+UseParNewGC -verbose:gc -XX:+PrintGCDateStamps HumongousAlloc
2013-05-07T16:15:25.187+0200: 0.177: [GC 997K->294K(6464K), 0.0051910 secs]
Notice timestamps are printed as well
+ gclog_or_tty->date_stamp(PrintGCDateStamps);
+ gclog_or_tty->stamp(PrintGCDateStamps);
The second added line should be PrintGCTimeStamp
Example:
% ./jdk6u-dev_hotspot-build/bin/java -Xmx2m -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC -XX:+UseParNewGC -verbose:gc -XX:+PrintGCDateStamps HumongousAlloc
2013-05-07T16:15:25.187+0200: 0.177: [GC 997K->294K(6464K), 0.0051910 secs]
Notice timestamps are printed as well
- backported by
-
JDK-8017373 Bug 7176220 uses PrintGCDateStamp where it should be PrintGCTimeStamp
-
- Closed
-
- relates to
-
JDK-7176220 'Full GC' events miss date stamp information occasionally
-
- Resolved
-