Uploaded image for project: 'JDK'
  1. JDK
  2. JDK-8019646

Clarify javadoc contract of LambdaMetafactory methods

    XMLWordPrintable

Details

    • Bug
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • P3
    • 8
    • None
    • core-libs

    Description

      Some implementation details of the metafactory are, by design, left unspecified. But many aspects of the contract -- what inputs are acceptable, how the flags are used, constraints on the result, etc. -- are intended to be consistent across implementations, and should be more precisely specified.

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          blocks

          Enhancement - null JDK-8015236 Provide Class.isFuntionalInterface functionality in core reflection

          • P4 - Minor loss of function, or other problem where easy workaround is present.
          • Open
          is blocked by

          Bug - A problem which impairs or prevents the functions of the product. JDK-8019635 Use MethodType for LambdaMetafactory contract rather than MethodHandle

          • P2 - Crashes, loss of data, severe memory leak.
          • Closed
          relates to

          Sub-task - The sub-task of the issue JDK-8024138 (Spec clarification) Lambda Metafactory spec should state DMH constraint on implMethod

          • P3 - Major loss of function.
          • Resolved

          Bug - A problem which impairs or prevents the functions of the product. JDK-8008365 LambdaMetafactory javadoc warnings

          • P3 - Major loss of function.
          • Resolved

          Bug - A problem which impairs or prevents the functions of the product. JDK-8019225 typo in LambdaMetafactory.altMetaFactory

          • P3 - Major loss of function.
          • Resolved

          Activity

            People

              briangoetz Brian Goetz
              dlsmith Dan Smith
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              3 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: