Loading...

XML

Word

Printable

Type: Bug
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: P3
Fix Version/s: 8
Affects Version/s: None
Component/s: core-libs
Labels:
- lambda
- noreg-doc

Subcomponent:
java.lang.invoke
Resolved In Build:
b115
Verification:
Verified

Some implementation details of the metafactory are, by design, left unspecified. But many aspects of the contract -- what inputs are acceptable, how the flags are used, constraints on the result, etc. -- are intended to be consistent across implementations, and should be more precisely specified.

blocks

JDK-8015236 Provide Class.isFuntionalInterface functionality in core reflection

Open

is blocked by

JDK-8019635 Use MethodType for LambdaMetafactory contract rather than MethodHandle

Closed

relates to

JDK-8024138 (Spec clarification) Lambda Metafactory spec should state DMH constraint on implMethod

Resolved

JDK-8008365 LambdaMetafactory javadoc warnings

Resolved

JDK-8019225 typo in LambdaMetafactory.altMetaFactory

Resolved

Assignee:: Brian Goetz

Reporter:: Dan Smith

Votes:: 0 Vote for this issue

Watchers:: 3 Start watching this issue

Created:: 2013-07-02 13:25

Updated:: 2017-05-16 17:28

Resolved:: 2013-10-24 10:17

Details

Description

Attachments

Issue Links

Activity

People

Dates