Description
It was found by the JCK tests that ArrayBlockingQueue provides (additionally) SIZED spliterator while the specification states:
"The Spliterator reports Spliterator.CONCURRENT, Spliterator.ORDERED, and Spliterator.NONNULL."
In a mail discussion this has been considered as a bug.
"The Spliterator reports Spliterator.CONCURRENT, Spliterator.ORDERED, and Spliterator.NONNULL."
In a mail discussion this has been considered as a bug.