There is at least one mechanical or editorial problem in java.lang.invoke javadoc which should be fixed.

Around line 657 of j.l.i.MethodHandle there is malformed javadoc:
   /**
    * Performs a variable arity invocation, passing the arguments in the given array
    * to the method handle, as if via an inexact {@link #invoke invoke} from a call site
    * which mentions only the type {@code Object}, and whose arity is the length
    * of the argument array.
    * <p>
    * This method is also equivalent to the following code:
    * <p><blockquote><pre>
    * {@link #invokeWithArguments(Object...) invokeWithArguments}{@code(arguments.toArray())}
    * </pre></blockquote>
    *
    * @param arguments the arguments to pass to the target
    * @return the result returned by the target
    * @throws NullPointerException if {@code arguments} is a null reference
    * @throws ClassCastException if an argument cannot be converted by reference casting
    * @throws WrongMethodTypeException if the target's type cannot be adjusted to take the given number of {@code Object} arguments
    * @throws Throwable anything thrown by the target method invocation
    */
   public Object invokeWithArguments(java.util.List<?> arguments) throws Throwable {
       return invokeWithArguments(arguments.toArray());
   }

The javadoc should not include javadoc tags to be interpretted inside <pre></pre>.