FULL PRODUCT VERSION :
java version "1.8.0-ea"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0-ea-b113)

A DESCRIPTION OF THE PROBLEM :
This a regression caused by this revision:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/c1f129f62f36

The problematic patch is:

- sb.append(date.getYear() + 1900);
+ sb.append(cal.get(Calendar.YEAR) + 1900);

Calendar.YEAR field is already in four-digit format and don't need +1900.

REGRESSION. Last worked in version 7u45

EXPECTED VERSUS ACTUAL BEHAVIOR :
EXPECTED -
<record>
  <date>2013-11-11T13:32:17</date>
(...)
</record>
ACTUAL -
<record>
  <date>3913-11-11T13:32:17</date>
(...)
</record>

REPRODUCIBILITY :
This bug can be reproduced always.

---------- BEGIN SOURCE ----------
// Quick Nashorn script test to run with bin/jjs:

var simpleFormatter = new java.util.logging.SimpleFormatter();
var xmlFormatter = new java.util.logging.XMLFormatter();

var logRecord = new java.util.logging.LogRecord(
java.util.logging.Level.SEVERE,
"Test"
);

var out = java.lang.System.out;
out.println(simpleFormatter.format(logRecord)); // good year
out.println(xmlFormatter.format(logRecord)); // wrong year
---------- END SOURCE ----------