FULL PRODUCT VERSION :
java version "1.8.0"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0-b132)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 25.0-b70, mixed mode)
ADDITIONAL OS VERSION INFORMATION :
Microsoft Windows [version: 6.0.6002]
A DESCRIPTION OF THE PROBLEM :
The following two methods are reported potentially ambigous:
- Object call1(Function<Object, Object> function)
- void call1(Consumer<Object> consumer)
However, the following two are not:
- void call2(Runnable consumer)
- Object call2(Callable<Object> function)
This seems inconsitent because in both case the argument list is the same for the functional interfaces and the overloaded methods differ only by one of the functional interfaces having a return value while the other does not.
When calling them,
call1((Object arg) -> {})
call2(() -> {})
compiles without any problem (no warning). However,
call1((arg) -> {})
is reported ambigous and does not compile.
STEPS TO FOLLOW TO REPRODUCE THE PROBLEM :
Compile the example code to see the warning.
EXPECTED VERSUS ACTUAL BEHAVIOR :
EXPECTED -
Expected no warnings and also, I expect "call1((arg) -> {})" to compile.
ACTUAL -
Warning is printed for the method "call1" and "call1((arg) -> {})" does not compile (due to reported being ambiguous).
ERROR MESSAGES/STACK TRACES THAT OCCUR :
warning: [overloads] call1(Consumer<Object>) in ExampleMethods is potentially ambiguous with call1(Function<Object,Object>) in ExampleMethods
REPRODUCIBILITY :
This bug can be reproduced always.
---------- BEGIN SOURCE ----------
import java.util.concurrent.Callable;
import java.util.function.Consumer;
import java.util.function.Function;
public final class ExampleMethods {
public static void call1(Consumer<Object> consumer) {
consumer.accept(null);
}
public static Object call1(Function<Object, Object> function) {
return function.apply(null);
}
public static void call2(Runnable consumer) {
consumer.run();
}
public static Object call2(Callable<Object> function) throws Exception {
return function.call();
}
public static void call1Example() {
call1((Object arg) -> {});
// Uncommenting the line below is a compile time error.
// call1((arg) -> {});
}
public static void call2Example() {
call2(() -> {});
}
}
---------- END SOURCE ----------
java version "1.8.0"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0-b132)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 25.0-b70, mixed mode)
ADDITIONAL OS VERSION INFORMATION :
Microsoft Windows [version: 6.0.6002]
A DESCRIPTION OF THE PROBLEM :
The following two methods are reported potentially ambigous:
- Object call1(Function<Object, Object> function)
- void call1(Consumer<Object> consumer)
However, the following two are not:
- void call2(Runnable consumer)
- Object call2(Callable<Object> function)
This seems inconsitent because in both case the argument list is the same for the functional interfaces and the overloaded methods differ only by one of the functional interfaces having a return value while the other does not.
When calling them,
call1((Object arg) -> {})
call2(() -> {})
compiles without any problem (no warning). However,
call1((arg) -> {})
is reported ambigous and does not compile.
STEPS TO FOLLOW TO REPRODUCE THE PROBLEM :
Compile the example code to see the warning.
EXPECTED VERSUS ACTUAL BEHAVIOR :
EXPECTED -
Expected no warnings and also, I expect "call1((arg) -> {})" to compile.
ACTUAL -
Warning is printed for the method "call1" and "call1((arg) -> {})" does not compile (due to reported being ambiguous).
ERROR MESSAGES/STACK TRACES THAT OCCUR :
warning: [overloads] call1(Consumer<Object>) in ExampleMethods is potentially ambiguous with call1(Function<Object,Object>) in ExampleMethods
REPRODUCIBILITY :
This bug can be reproduced always.
---------- BEGIN SOURCE ----------
import java.util.concurrent.Callable;
import java.util.function.Consumer;
import java.util.function.Function;
public final class ExampleMethods {
public static void call1(Consumer<Object> consumer) {
consumer.accept(null);
}
public static Object call1(Function<Object, Object> function) {
return function.apply(null);
}
public static void call2(Runnable consumer) {
consumer.run();
}
public static Object call2(Callable<Object> function) throws Exception {
return function.call();
}
public static void call1Example() {
call1((Object arg) -> {});
// Uncommenting the line below is a compile time error.
// call1((arg) -> {});
}
public static void call2Example() {
call2(() -> {});
}
}
---------- END SOURCE ----------
- duplicates
-
JDK-8029718 Should always use lambda body structure to disambiguate overload resolution
- Closed
-
JDK-8064866 incorrect compiler warning "potentially ambiguous"
- Closed