j.u.regex.Matcher.appendReplace/Tail() should support StringBuilder variant for better performance

XMLWordPrintable

    • Type: Enhancement
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Priority: P4
    • 9
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Component/s: core-libs
    • b08
    • Verified

      The Matcher class has a few public methods that take StringBuffers,
      and we've found it useful to add similar versions that take StringBuilders.

      It has two benefits:

      - Users don't have to convert from one to the other when they want to use
      the method in question. The symmetry is nice.

      - The StringBuilder variants are faster (if lock optimizations don't kick
      in, which happens in the interpreter and the client compiler). For
      interpreted / client-compiled code, we saw something like a 25% speedup on
      String.replaceAll(), which calls into this code.

            Assignee:
            Xueming Shen
            Reporter:
            Xueming Shen
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: