JCK8 test vm/constantpool/accessControl/accessControl004/accessControl00402m3/accessControl00402m3.html fails with -Xbatch -Xcomp due to bad field access check in C1 and C2

Precondition:
-------------

Consider the following class hierarchy:

    A
  / \
 B1 B2

A declares a field "aa" which both B1 and B2 inherit.

Despite aa is declared in a super class of B1, methods in B1 might not access the field aa of an object of class B2:

class B1 extends A {
  m(B2 b2) {
    ...
    x = b2.aa; // !!! Access not allowed
  }
}

This is checked by the test mentioned above.


Problem:
--------

ciField::will_link() used by C1 and C2 does the access check using the canonical_holder (which is A in this case) and thus the access erroneously succeeds.


Fix:
----

In ciField::ciField(), just before the canonical holder is stored into the _holder variable (and which is used by ciField::will_link()) perform an additional access check with the holder declared in the class file. If this check fails, store the declared holder instead and ciField::will_link() will bail out compilation for this field later on. Then, the interpreter will throw an PrivilegedAccessException at runtime.


Ways to reproduce:
------------------

Run the above JCK test with

C2 only: -XX:-TieredCompilation -Xbatch -Xcomp

or

with C1: -XX:-Inline -Xbatch -Xcomp

Evaluation
---------------

We consider this fix critical as access control is broken. Fields can be accessed errornously.