FULL PRODUCT VERSION :


A DESCRIPTION OF THE PROBLEM :
The signature of OptionalInt.orElseThrow is
<X extends Throwable> int orElseThrow(Supplier<X> exceptionSupplier) throws X;

Similarly, the signature of OptionalDouble.orElseThrow is
<X extends Throwable> double orElseThrow(Supplier<X> exceptionSupplier) throws X;

and the signature of OptionalLong.orElseThrow is
<X extends Throwable> long orElseThrow(Supplier<X> exceptionSupplier) throws X;

The signature of Optional<T>.orElseThrow, however, is
public<X extends Throwable> int orElseThrow(Supplier<? extends X> exceptionSupplier) throws X;

I believe that Supplier<? extends X> is redundant, in which case it should be only Supplier<X>, as in OptionalInt, OptionalDouble, and OptionalLong.

If there is a reason for Supplier<? extends X> in Optional<T>, then the Supplier for OptionalInt, OptionalDouble, and OptionalLong should also be a Supplier<? extends X>



REPRODUCIBILITY :
This bug can be reproduced always.