Uploaded image for project: 'JDK'
  1. JDK
  2. JDK-8062794

TypeVariable<D>.getAnnotatedBounds is incompatible to earlier version

XMLWordPrintable

    • Icon: Bug Bug
    • Resolution: Won't Fix
    • Icon: P4 P4
    • None
    • 8u25, 8u40
    • core-libs

      FULL PRODUCT VERSION :
      java version "1.8.0_25"
      Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_25-b18)
      Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.25-b02, mixed mode)

      java version "1.7.0_67"
      Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.7.0_67-b01)
      Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 24.65-b04, mixed mode)

      ADDITIONAL OS VERSION INFORMATION :
      Microsoft Windows [Version 6.1.7601]

      A DESCRIPTION OF THE PROBLEM :
      I wanted to update a third-party class that implement interface java.lang.reflect.TypeVariable<D> so that I can compile it both with Java SE 7 and 8, but new method getAnnotatedBounds made it impossible.

      The new method must return an array of java.lang.reflect.AnnotatedType that was introduced in Java SE 8 but I must implement getAnnotatedBounds so that I can compile the class with Java SE 8 but without AnnotatedType to compile it with Java SE 7. The addition of getAnnotatedBounds prevents me from choosing Java SE 7 or 8 when compiling the class source code.

      I hope you know how to cope with such incompatibility.

      STEPS TO FOLLOW TO REPRODUCE THE PROBLEM :
      1. Make Demo.java with the following content:

      import java.lang.annotation.Annotation;
      import java.lang.reflect.Type;
      import java.lang.reflect.TypeVariable;

      public class Demo implements TypeVariable<Class> {
          public Type[] getBounds() {
              throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
          }
          public Class getGenericDeclaration() {
              throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
          }
          public String getName() {
              throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
          }
          public java.lang.reflect.AnnotatedType[] getAnnotatedBounds() {
              throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
          }
          public <T extends Annotation> T getAnnotation(Class<T> annotationClass) {
              throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
          }
          public Annotation[] getAnnotations() {
              throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
          }
          public Annotation[] getDeclaredAnnotations() {
              throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
          }
      }

      2. Compile Demo.java with Java SE 8 javac.
      3. Compile Demo.java with Java SE 7 javac.

      EXPECTED VERSUS ACTUAL BEHAVIOR :
      EXPECTED -
      The class is compiled without errors on both versions.
      ACTUAL -
      It is successfully compiled with Java SE 8 but not with Java SE 7. If I remove method getAnnotatedBounds and import java.lang.reflect.AnnotatedType, it is successfully compiled with Java SE 7 but not with Java SE 8.

      ERROR MESSAGES/STACK TRACES THAT OCCUR :
      Java SE 7 javac with getAnnotatedBounds:

      Demo.java:16: error: cannot find symbol
          public java.lang.reflect.AnnotatedType[] getAnnotatedBounds() {
                                  ^
        symbol: class AnnotatedType
        location: package java.lang.reflect
      1 error

      Java SE 8 javac without get AnnotatedBounds:

      Demo.java:6: error: Demo is not abstract and does not override abstract method getAnnotatedBounds() in TypeVariable
      public class Demo implements TypeVariable<Class> {
             ^
      1 error

      REPRODUCIBILITY :
      This bug can be reproduced always.

      ---------- BEGIN SOURCE ----------
      No need to execute the program.
      ---------- END SOURCE ----------

      CUSTOMER SUBMITTED WORKAROUND :
      Write my own version of interface TypeVariable<D> like the Java SE 7 definition. I do not know if other classes would use the real TypeVariable<D>.

            darcy Joe Darcy
            webbuggrp Webbug Group
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            5 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: