Use of a default constructor may be a reasonable javac lint warning.
- csr for
-
JDK-8250795 Add javac lint warning when a default constructor is created
-
- Closed
-
- relates to
-
JDK-8236695 java.lang.Record should be declared with an explicit constructor
-
- Resolved
-
-
JDK-8177153 LambdaMetafactory has default constructor
-
- Closed
-
-
JDK-8183175 Add explicit constructors to MalformedParameterizedTypeException
-
- Closed
-
-
JDK-8250919 Mark compiler-generated elements as mandated
-
- Open
-
-
JDK-8224174 java.lang.Number has a default constructor
-
- Resolved
-
-
JDK-8230723 Remove default constructors from java.lang and java.io
-
- Resolved
-
-
JDK-8230734 Remove default constructors from java.compiler
-
- Resolved
-
-
JDK-8247374 Remove default constructors from javax.net.ssl
-
- Resolved
-
-
JDK-8251921 Expand default constructor warning to cover more cases
-
- Resolved
-
-
JDK-8250212 Address reliance on default constructors in the JDK (umbrella)
-
- Closed
-
-
JDK-8249634 doclint should report implicit constructor as missing javadoc comments
-
- Resolved
-
-
JDK-8278251 Enable "missing-explicit-ctor" check in the jdk.unsupported.desktop module
-
- Resolved
-
-
JDK-8250558 ☂ Many JavaFX classes have implicit no-arg constructors
-
- Resolved
-
-
JDK-8071959 java.lang.Object uses implicit default constructor
-
- Resolved
-