-
Type:
Bug
-
Resolution: Not an Issue
-
Priority:
P3
-
Affects Version/s: 9
-
Component/s: client-libs
Just another minor question about @2x Naming Convention
please takeJDK-8133847 test example and define
private static final String IMAGE_NAME_1X = "image.png";
private static final String IMAGE_NAME_2X = "image@2x.png";
- the image loaded should be recognized as a multi-resolution image (Mac OS X 10.10.3, JDK9 b77).
Then please try the following pairs:
"image.png" + "image@2X.png" (capital letter 'X'), "IMAGE.png" + "image@2x.png", "IMAGE.png" + "iMaGe@2x.png" etc., - the result will be the same.
Could it lead to some mess?
At a 1st glance there are no mentions about the case sensitivity in the convention.
please take
private static final String IMAGE_NAME_1X = "image.png";
private static final String IMAGE_NAME_2X = "image@2x.png";
- the image loaded should be recognized as a multi-resolution image (Mac OS X 10.10.3, JDK9 b77).
Then please try the following pairs:
"image.png" + "image@2X.png" (capital letter 'X'), "IMAGE.png" + "image@2x.png", "IMAGE.png" + "iMaGe@2x.png" etc., - the result will be the same.
Could it lead to some mess?
At a 1st glance there are no mentions about the case sensitivity in the convention.