output:
java.beans.ConstructorProperties
java.beans.ConstructorProperties (rt.jar)
-> java.lang.Object rt.jar
-> java.lang.String rt.jar
-> java.lang.annotation.Annotation rt.jar
-> java.lang.annotation.Documented rt.jar
-> java.lang.annotation.Retention rt.jar
-> java.lang.annotation.Target rt.jar
while I was also expecting dependencies to
java.lang.annotation.ElementType
and
java.lang.annotation.RetentionPolicy
More feedbacks from Jeff Hains:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jigsaw-dev/2015-August/004456.html
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jigsaw-dev/2015-September/004464.html
jdeps should report the list of class names matching the list that are needed during compilation as closely as possible. It may be useful to have an option to choose types that are needed at runtime vs all types including annotations.
java.beans.ConstructorProperties
java.beans.ConstructorProperties (rt.jar)
-> java.lang.Object rt.jar
-> java.lang.String rt.jar
-> java.lang.annotation.Annotation rt.jar
-> java.lang.annotation.Documented rt.jar
-> java.lang.annotation.Retention rt.jar
-> java.lang.annotation.Target rt.jar
while I was also expecting dependencies to
java.lang.annotation.ElementType
and
java.lang.annotation.RetentionPolicy
More feedbacks from Jeff Hains:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jigsaw-dev/2015-August/004456.html
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jigsaw-dev/2015-September/004464.html
jdeps should report the list of class names matching the list that are needed during compilation as closely as possible. It may be useful to have an option to choose types that are needed at runtime vs all types including annotations.