-
Enhancement
-
Resolution: Unresolved
-
P4
-
9
-
In Review
That happens when the type those tags refer to are not public/protected.
It doesn't matter if the type should've been public or it shouldn't have been referred to, javadoc should generate a warning in this case
It doesn't matter if the type should've been public or it shouldn't have been referred to, javadoc should generate a warning in this case
- csr for
-
JDK-8356777 Types referred in @link/@linkplain tags are not always hyperlinks
-
- Provisional
-
- is blocked by
-
JDK-8356549 javadoc has incorrect {@link/@linkplain} tags with refer to private/protected types
-
- Open
-
- relates to
-
JDK-8310868 Thread.interrupt() method's javadoc has an incorrect {@link}
-
- Resolved
-
-
JDK-8130859 Constants referred in @value tag are not always displayed
-
- Open
-
-
JDK-8273084 Specify how to resolve an ambiguous reference to an overloaded method
-
- Open
-
- links to
-
Review(master) openjdk/jdk/25187
(1 links to)