-
Bug
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
P3
-
9
-
b91
| Issue | Fix Version | Assignee | Priority | Status | Resolution | Resolved In Build |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JDK-8142577 | emb-9 | Magnus Ihse Bursie | P3 | Resolved | Fixed | team |
The build system has not been good at separating LIBS from LDFLAGS. In fact, when we started doing this,
the name "LDFLAGS_SUFFIX" was used for what is traditionally called LIBS. This unwieldy name has unfortunately
been kept, and possibly as a cause of this, we have not been good at differing between flags to the linker
and libraries needed to link with.
We should rename LDFLAGS_SUFFIX (and all of it's variants) to LIBS, and make sure we use LDFLAGS for flags
and LIBS for libs.
the name "LDFLAGS_SUFFIX" was used for what is traditionally called LIBS. This unwieldy name has unfortunately
been kept, and possibly as a cause of this, we have not been good at differing between flags to the linker
and libraries needed to link with.
We should rename LDFLAGS_SUFFIX (and all of it's variants) to LIBS, and make sure we use LDFLAGS for flags
and LIBS for libs.
- backported by
-
JDK-8142577 Rename LDFLAGS_SUFFIX to LIBS
-
- Resolved
-
- relates to
-
-
- Resolved
-
-
-
- Resolved
-