FULL PRODUCT VERSION :
java full version "9-ea+100-2016-01-06-195905.javare.4235.nc"

ADDITIONAL OS VERSION INFORMATION :
 x86_64 GNU/Linux


A DESCRIPTION OF THE PROBLEM :
The fix for JDK-8075274 (compilation still depends on the order of imports) [1][2], seems to have introduced another source ordering bug.

[1] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/langtools/rev/4914b013c305
[2] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8075274

REGRESSION. Last worked in version 8u66

ADDITIONAL REGRESSION INFORMATION:
java full version "1.8.0_66-ea-b02"


STEPS TO FOLLOW TO REPRODUCE THE PROBLEM :
javac One.java Two.java Three.java Test.java
javac Test.java One.java Two.java Three.java


EXPECTED VERSUS ACTUAL BEHAVIOR :
EXPECTED -
I expected both compilations to succeed.
ACTUAL -
The first compilation succeeds, but the second compilation fails.

ERROR MESSAGES/STACK TRACES THAT OCCUR :
One.java:3: error: cannot find symbol
class One implements Two.ThreeInner {
                        ^
  symbol: class ThreeInner
  location: class Two
1 error


REPRODUCIBILITY :
This bug can be reproduced always.

---------- BEGIN SOURCE ----------
=== Test.java ===
package p;

import p.One.OneInner;

class Test implements OneInner {}

=== One.java ===
package p;

class One implements Two.ThreeInner {
  interface OneInner {}
}

=== Two.java ===
package p;

class Two extends Three {}

=== Three.java ===
package p;

class Three {
  interface ThreeInner {}
}
===
---------- END SOURCE ----------

CUSTOMER SUBMITTED WORKAROUND :
Using canonical qualified type names (e.g. Three.ThreeInner instead of Two.ThreeInner) seems to work around the problem.