-
Bug
-
Resolution: Won't Fix
-
P3
-
None
-
8, 9
-
None
-
generic
-
generic
It contains a Destroyable field but does not itself implement Destroyable which seems like an oversight.
private fields could/should also be final.
Probably too late but the constructor should have used Objects.requireNonNull on args.
private fields could/should also be final.
Probably too late but the constructor should have used Objects.requireNonNull on args.
- csr for
-
JDK-8275823 java.security.KeyPair should implement Destroyable
-
- Closed
-
- relates to
-
JDK-6263419 No way to clean the memory for a java.security.Key
-
- Closed
-
-
JDK-8228414 KeyStore.PrivateKeyEntry and KeyStore.SecretKeyEntry should implement Destroyable
-
- Closed
-
- links to
-
Review openjdk/jdk/6089